Skip to main content

Review: X-Men Days of Future Past


Bryan Singer's homecoming to the franchise he built is a welcome on. The X-Men series was stagnant after his departure to take over Superman Returns and it wasn't until he and Matthew Vaughn made X-Men: First Class that Marvel's famous mutants got their swagger back. James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender and Jennifer Lawrence added a spark to the origins of Professor Xavier, Magneto and Raven/Mystique, so it made perfect sense to use that bright spot now to combine casts for one of the best graphic novels that featured Xavier and his team.



Sentinels were created to protect humans from mutant threats by Bolivar Trask (Peter Dinklage) in 1973. 50 years later those same Sentinels are hunting down humans who aid mutants as well. Most mutants are either imprisoned or dead, but Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and a small band of the old X-Men still fighting for another day. Along with Magneto (Ian McKellen), Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) and Storm (Halle Berry), Xavier seeks any way to defeat the Sentinel threat.

Dark isn't just a buzzword for this installation of the X-Men franchise. Singer uses Holocaust imagery to frightening effect in creating the future Logan, Xavier and Magneto face. Trask's handiwork is able to adapt to and counteract all mutant abilities, killing mutants like Colossus and Blink in brutal fashion again and again. It's a little jarring at first to see heroes killed in a comic book film, but Singer isn't afraid to go to Days of Future Past's more uncomfortable roots. Especially when it is revealed Sentinels gained those powers from the torture and murder of mutants.

All is not lost yet, fortunately, Kitty Pryde (Ellen Page) has created a loophole by sending a person's consciousness into the past to send him/her a warning, but there are limits to her power. She can only send someone back a few weeks before it causes irreparable brain damage. Cue awkward silence before everyone remembers Logan's healing abilities. His journey back will not be easy, Xavier warns him. Rewriting the future will involve getting young Charles, Erik and Raven (James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender and Jennifer Lawrence) on the same page and in 1973 the three could not be further apart.

Charles lies in the ruins of what used to be Xavier’s School For Gifted Youngsters a shell of his former self, trading in his gifts for the use of his legs. After uncovering the Sentinel program, Raven/Mystique spans the globe seeking to assassinate Trask for his crimes against mutant kind, and Magneto spends his days in a prison underneath the Pentagon. This wouldn't be an easy task even for a saint, but the outcome is doubly uncertain given patience isn't a strong suit for the man with bone claws and a quick temper.

At first glance it's obvious the biggest flaw of Days of Future Past will be the overly stuffed roster of characters it's working with. Singer balances the two timelines well giving McAvoy/Fassbender/Lawrence/Jackman equal due with Stewart/McKellen/Page. Some characters are around only for a one-off display of their powers and it works. Quicksilver's (Evan Peters) inclusion seemed like an odd choice after some of the costume designs leaked, but he easily has one of the coolest sequences in the film.

Previous X-sequels didn't really allow for the type of pathos that James McAvoy can tap into as a younger, disillusioned Xavier who has watched countless friends/peers/students die or lose their way. Action extravaganzas typically ditch character development for sequences depicting city-wide destruction, but McAvoy is given a chance to shine alongside Jackman's typically charming Wolverine.

In a genre known for gritty realism and dark sequels, Singer emphasizes the hope that has made the X-Men franchise so unique. Despite the ignorance, hate and anger, there will always be hope for a brighter day. And if Bryan Singer hangs around, the prospects for future X-Men features looks bright indeed.

Popular posts from this blog

The Best of the Decade

Over the last ten years, the cinema has given us a great deal to be thankful for: a rebirth of the Batman franchise, a series of examinations of what it means to live in this particular decade, and a mass of character studies whether they be animated or popcorn thrillers. As much as I have enjoyed the offerings, a list must be culled together for the end of the year. Except this year is different, this year ten films must be selected from hundreds. Below are some of the best of the aughts. Enjoy! 10) There Will Be Blood Paul Thomas Anderson's magnum opus, a scathing look at extremism in America and the evils of greed and profiteering from religion. It also features the best performance of the decade with Daniel Day-Lewis as oil-man Daniel Plainview. 9)  Up A beautiful tale that entrances all ages,  Up managed to captivate children and tell a tale that adults cherish as well. 8) The Dark Knight Maybe just a comic book film, but it is the best comic book film

Paprika vs. Inception

Months before Inception hit the theaters forums were alive with rumors that Christopher Nolan either accidentally or intentionally stole some details from another film, the Japanese anime Paprika. The biggest point of comparison for some bloggers and forum runners was the fact that both of the films featured a device that allowed a person, or people, to travel into another’s dreams and delve into their subconscious. Minor points of comparison include scenes in Paprika where the character Paprika breaks through a mirrored wall by holding her hand to it, as well as a scene where a police detective falls his way down a hallway. Claims have been made that Inception abounds with imagery similar to or exactly like the anime movie, but with the recent release of the film on DVD and Blu-Ray, and with Paprika available for several years now, an examination of the two plots can be made more fully. Let us begin with the primary claim— Inception stole the idea of a dream

Armond White or: How I Learned to Stop Caring and Ignore the Troll

Whether it is his glowing review of Norbit , his thrashing of Toy Story 3 , or just his general pompousness, you are aware of Armond White. His dismissal of Toy Story 3 came at a convenient time when the film was sitting pretty with a perfect score on Rotten Tomatoes. "But Toy Story 3 is so besotted with brand names and product-placement that it stops being about the innocent pleasures of imagination—the usefulness of toys—and strictly celebrates consumerism." A claim that could have been taken at face value had he not followed it with this sentiment " Transformers 2 already explored the same plot to greater thrill and opulence." I am sure if one were inclined to interview Michael Bay at his most enlightened he would have never crafted an answer that insightful regarding hidden parables in his Transformers vehicle. White was at his most incensed when forced to sit down and type out his thoughts regarding Precious , but praised Norbit for its reflection o