Skip to main content

Review: Under the Skin


Arthouse curios are truly one of the great gifts that cinema continually offers to fans of indie filmmaking. There isn't a lot of room for experimentation in blockbusters or mid-budget dramas, but with a film like Under the Skin, anything goes. Jonathan Glazer has turned in two off-beat pictures in Sexy Beast and Birth, but this, this is an even rarer find. With the exception of casting star Scarlett Johansson, everything about Under the Skin is a barebones production, from the use of non-actors to utilizing hidden cameras to capture scenes.

An alien seductress (Scarlett Johansson) preys upon hitchhikers in Scotland. The game is easy enough for the unnamed lead, she shows the slightest flirtation and the local men quite willing jump into her large van. If at first the dialogue of the locals in Glasgow seems imperceptible, don't fret over your hearing. Glazer equipped the van with hidden cameras and mikes so that the men talking with Johansson are actually ordinary guys right off the street. Once in the van she determines if the man in her passenger seat is socially isolated enough to proceed to the next stage of the evening. Fans of Nirvana might qualify it as a "tar-pit trap," but in the interest of keeping the surprises for the theatre no more details will be revealed.

With each new victim, Glazer reveals a little more of the process while still holding the audience at arm's length. There is a deliberate refusal to reveal too much of what happens to her victims, or the motivations as to why she does anything she does. The lack of answers may prove frustrating at times due to the slow pacing, but the slow dread that builds throughout the film proves much more satisfying for it.

What helps Under the Skin transcend "mere curio"and into a very effective piece of cerebral horror is the nearly perfect technical composition of the sound and look of the film. Jonathan Glazer manages to take a world we are quite immersed in and familiar with and turn it into a dark and dangerous place. Malls and nightclub raves take on a surreal light where the promise of violence flickers in the strobe lights and rhythmic dance movements surrounding the visitor. There is a lot of deeply upsetting imagery that stays with viewers heading out of the theatre, aided by the alien score by Mica Levi. Levi's score sets the audience on edge throughout the runtime by stretching notes beyond the recognizable. With the exception of Johansson and Glazer, she has perhaps the greatest affect on the film.

No slouch herself, Scarlett Johansson succeeds in the unenviable task of portraying a woman completely new to the experiences Earth offers. Johansson utilizes little facial expression in her portrayal of a cold, unfeeling visitor to this planet mostly registering as blank for most of the runtime. However once she turns her back on her trade the curiosity that she repressed before prove too strong to ignore. Laughs and fear flash across her face as much a surprise to her as it is to the audience. It would be too simplistic to say that Johansson's alien falls prey to human nature. She tries to replicate what she has seen in those around her, but even the simple act of eating cake proves impossible. Many of the impenetrable aspects of living as a human escape her. Yet, perhaps the most interesting aspect of the performance is that she and Glazer are deconstructing how she is objectified in other films to effect here. It's a very pointed effort at audience members who only came in for the sexual aspects of the film.

There may never be another Stanley Kubrick, but Glazer is placing himself on the short-list by creating art that demands to not only be seen, but parsed through and examined. Under the Skin may not be the best film of a still-developing 2014, but it has certainly proven itself to be the most discussed, if not the most interesting. Don't be left out of the conversation, see it.

Popular posts from this blog

The Best of the Decade

Over the last ten years, the cinema has given us a great deal to be thankful for: a rebirth of the Batman franchise, a series of examinations of what it means to live in this particular decade, and a mass of character studies whether they be animated or popcorn thrillers. As much as I have enjoyed the offerings, a list must be culled together for the end of the year. Except this year is different, this year ten films must be selected from hundreds. Below are some of the best of the aughts. Enjoy! 10) There Will Be Blood Paul Thomas Anderson's magnum opus, a scathing look at extremism in America and the evils of greed and profiteering from religion. It also features the best performance of the decade with Daniel Day-Lewis as oil-man Daniel Plainview. 9)  Up A beautiful tale that entrances all ages,  Up managed to captivate children and tell a tale that adults cherish as well. 8) The Dark Knight Maybe just a comic book film, but it is the best comic book film

Paprika vs. Inception

Months before Inception hit the theaters forums were alive with rumors that Christopher Nolan either accidentally or intentionally stole some details from another film, the Japanese anime Paprika. The biggest point of comparison for some bloggers and forum runners was the fact that both of the films featured a device that allowed a person, or people, to travel into another’s dreams and delve into their subconscious. Minor points of comparison include scenes in Paprika where the character Paprika breaks through a mirrored wall by holding her hand to it, as well as a scene where a police detective falls his way down a hallway. Claims have been made that Inception abounds with imagery similar to or exactly like the anime movie, but with the recent release of the film on DVD and Blu-Ray, and with Paprika available for several years now, an examination of the two plots can be made more fully. Let us begin with the primary claim— Inception stole the idea of a dream

Armond White or: How I Learned to Stop Caring and Ignore the Troll

Whether it is his glowing review of Norbit , his thrashing of Toy Story 3 , or just his general pompousness, you are aware of Armond White. His dismissal of Toy Story 3 came at a convenient time when the film was sitting pretty with a perfect score on Rotten Tomatoes. "But Toy Story 3 is so besotted with brand names and product-placement that it stops being about the innocent pleasures of imagination—the usefulness of toys—and strictly celebrates consumerism." A claim that could have been taken at face value had he not followed it with this sentiment " Transformers 2 already explored the same plot to greater thrill and opulence." I am sure if one were inclined to interview Michael Bay at his most enlightened he would have never crafted an answer that insightful regarding hidden parables in his Transformers vehicle. White was at his most incensed when forced to sit down and type out his thoughts regarding Precious , but praised Norbit for its reflection o