Skip to main content

Review: A Long Journey (The Hobbit)

The Hobbit saw a great deal of turmoil cast its way before the first reel was ever shown. MGM went bankrupt, Guillermo Del Toro dropped out of the project and if all of that weren't bad enough, the first buzz about the film was that the high frame rate made it look like an afternoon soap.

Peter Jackson was always going to have a difficult time bringing another of J.R.R. Tolkien's books to life, given the enviable success he had with Lord of the Rings. The Hobbit is considered to be the lighter of the two stories and when Jackson announced that he was going to extend the story into a trilogy, sighs could be heard "he's doing it again."

The story is familiar enough: a hobbit is asked by Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen) to undertake a journey that could prove dangerous. Bilbo may survive, Gandalf contends, but he will never be the same. Thorin Oakenshield and the remaining members of his clan aim to reclaim their kingdom from the dragon Smaug that ravaged their homeland so many ages ago.

There's nothing inherently wrong with The Hobbit, but the repetition and excessive runtime creaks and groans. To boot, it has to contend with the massive expectations created by The Lord of the Rings. Still, the missteps seem to pile up the further the film goes on.

The fourteen dwarves are virtually impossible to distinguish. Characters aren't fleshed out and even the titular Bilbo (Martin Freeman) disappears for long stretches of time. Battle scenes feel tacked on and insignificant. The highs aren't as high and the lows are lower. Everything spectacular has been seen in the previous trilogy, so during the lags you can feel the seconds tick away. The Hobbit only really starts to display a pulse when Gollum (Andy Serkis) challenges Bilbo to a deadly game of riddles.

With all of that said, there is no need to push the Episode I panic button just yet.

Ian McKellen's Gandalf is still as wry and clever as ever as he ever was. Martin Freeman embodies all of the hearth of the Baggins patriarch while incorporating some of Ian Holm's quirks. Richard Armitage also lives up to the mythic reputation as Thorin. These characters are the saving grace of the flick and if Jackson could cleave some of the extra material he added, the dynamic relationships between characters that made Rings so special could be utilized here.

Peter Jackson crops little from the picture and one hopes that the next film is considerably trimmer. The first portion of The Hobbit series stumbles over itself, but the next installment will feature a lot more of Smaug. Let's also hope that it features more Bilbo.

**1/2 out of ****

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Anomalisa

Weird is rarely used as a good quality in film criticism, but few words so completely describe Charlie Kaufman’s work as weird does. All of his films are a window into his very particular worldview, and that p.o.v. is certainly unlike anything seen in pop culture. For that reason, Anomalisa became an entry on many most anticipated lists for 2015. That Kaufman chose stop-motion to tell this story made the picture an event. So it came as a disappointment when the film was one of the year’s more mundane efforts.

Being John Malkovich and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind have an energy and heart at the center that is not present here. Previous collaborators like Spike Jonze and Michel Gondry were able to temper the overwhelming negativity Charlie Kaufman occasionally falls prey to, but, this time, the writer doesn’t have a director to rein things in. In all of his efforts to create an experience that is both familiar and alienating, Kaufman may have accidentally created something host…

Hulk vs. The Incredible Hulk vs. The Avengers

There are two movies about the Hulk and one that features the green monster as a major player. One was made in 2003 by an auteur, starring a little-known Aussie. Five years later The Incredible Hulk came out to the same tepid reaction as Ang Lee's Hulk did. This weekend, The Avengers made the Hulk as popular as he has been in a long time. So it comes down to this: Hulk vs. Hulk vs. Hulk. Who will smash whom?

Round One: Acting
Edward Norton outshines Eric Bana as the dual persona of the meek Bruce Banner and the rage-induced Hulk. Eric Bana was given little to do but run and fight and often the audience was just waiting for him to transform. With the Incredible Hulk, Norton's Banner is fully fleshed-out and we are given a reason to care about him. Being allowed to go a little dark with Banner's scenes questioning what is left of his life provided emotional resonance to the character that Hulk lacked. Yet even with the capable performance that Norton gives there was something …

The Dream Is Real

For my money there is nothing cooler than the idea of a city folding in on itself.