Skip to main content

Review: Tree of Life

After what seemed like an eternity to fans of Terrence Malick's filmography, Tree of Life made its debut at Cannes. Responses to the film were varied and lines were drawn in the sand. Terrence Malick tends to have that reaction on people. From Badlands to The New World, the atmospheric flourishes and strokes that Malick uses to paint his stories quite often alienate viewers. Common narratives are often ignored in favor of sweeping shots of the world around the characters and ethereal voice overs that convey the thoughts, hopes and dreams of those we watch onscreen.

Mr. O'Brien and Mrs. O'Brien offer contrasting lifestyles to their three children: the way of force and the way of grace. The patron O'Brien knows what little this life gives, it has to be hard-earned, or taken. Regret has colored Mr. O'Brien's life by his passions that have languished and he needs to make that impact felt for his three sons. Life is not to be frivolously spent and Brad Pitt's evenhanded approach to the patriarch is one of the major strengths of a film that feels disjointed. Jessica Chastain similarly presents a strong foil to her domineering husband.

Mrs. O'Brien suggests there has to be a different way: nurture. Throughout the majority of Tree of Life, Jack is adapting to the world he finds himself in. He rails against his father, yet when given time to flourish in his absence, Jack instead revels in the violence that his mother objects to. Torn between two worlds, Jack struggles to find himself.

For all of the beauty present in the shots of Earth in its adolescence, Malick loses focus in what is really the core of Tree of Life: family. The trials and tribulations as Jack goes from wayward youth to lost adult (Sean Penn) should be the highlight, but it is shifted from so frequently that the story has no time to lay down its roots. Without a doubt these renderings of space and primordial Earth are breathtakingly captured by Emmanuel Lubezki. Few scenes in cinematic history are as beautiful as these. Yet, the loose connection to the dichotomy that is Jack's childhood detracts from the ultimate effort.

The depiction of small-town life in Texas is something that Malick has done before and does well. When he focuses on that subject he excels. To argue that Terrence Malick only focus on minute details is not a realistic expectation as he is one of the few auteurs that always has a larger focus. Frustratingly, this results in a film that is both wonderful and messy.

**1/2 out of ****

Popular posts from this blog

The Dream Is Real

For my money there is nothing cooler than the idea of a city folding in on itself.

Review: Anomalisa

Weird is rarely used as a good quality in film criticism, but few words so completely describe Charlie Kaufman’s work as weird does. All of his films are a window into his very particular worldview, and that p.o.v. is certainly unlike anything seen in pop culture. For that reason, Anomalisa became an entry on many most anticipated lists for 2015. That Kaufman chose stop-motion to tell this story made the picture an event. So it came as a disappointment when the film was one of the year’s more mundane efforts.

Being John Malkovich and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind have an energy and heart at the center that is not present here. Previous collaborators like Spike Jonze and Michel Gondry were able to temper the overwhelming negativity Charlie Kaufman occasionally falls prey to, but, this time, the writer doesn’t have a director to rein things in. In all of his efforts to create an experience that is both familiar and alienating, Kaufman may have accidentally created something host…

Hulk vs. The Incredible Hulk vs. The Avengers

There are two movies about the Hulk and one that features the green monster as a major player. One was made in 2003 by an auteur, starring a little-known Aussie. Five years later The Incredible Hulk came out to the same tepid reaction as Ang Lee's Hulk did. This weekend, The Avengers made the Hulk as popular as he has been in a long time. So it comes down to this: Hulk vs. Hulk vs. Hulk. Who will smash whom?

Round One: Acting
Edward Norton outshines Eric Bana as the dual persona of the meek Bruce Banner and the rage-induced Hulk. Eric Bana was given little to do but run and fight and often the audience was just waiting for him to transform. With the Incredible Hulk, Norton's Banner is fully fleshed-out and we are given a reason to care about him. Being allowed to go a little dark with Banner's scenes questioning what is left of his life provided emotional resonance to the character that Hulk lacked. Yet even with the capable performance that Norton gives there was something …