Skip to main content

Review: Stoker

Hollywood is running short on new talent. Imports have always been a large reason for the influx of rising stars and directors and this time the scouring net has landed upon the Pacific, specifically, South Korea and Park Chan-wook, its most celebrated director.

Stoker serves as the English-language debut of Park, most known for his unconventional works like Oldboy, Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance and Lady Vengeance (better known as the revenge trilogy). His films don't make for comfortable viewing because they ask when violence can be justified and then shows you devastating effects it can take afterward.

That Park uses Shadow of a Doubt for the inspiration of Stoker shouldn't come as much of a surprise given the director has stated that Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo made him decide to become a filmmaker. The script written by Wentworth Miller focuses on a seemingly perfect family is submerged in a layer of grime and filth impending sense of doom. Uncle Charlie is also the name of the main antagonist in Hitchcock’s classic, and his entrance is fairly similar.

India Stoker (Mia Wasikowska) is shocked by the sudden loss of her father (Dermot Mulroney) in a tragic car accident. More intrusive is the unannounced arrival of Uncle Charlie (Matthew Goode), whom India has never met before. Eve (an icy Nicole Kidman) takes Charlie in without hesitation and the two grow close, closer than India is comfortable with. Charlie has a way with the women in the Stoker clan, India suspects that this disarming man has ulterior motives beneath his polished surface. The suspicion doesn't lead to horror though, she becomes entranced by him.

Charlie's arrival does not come without consequence however, the peace and tranquility of the household is upended by other accidents. Aunt Gwendolyn appears for dinner and then disappears without word for the rest of her visit, the most senior staff at the Stoker house leaves without saying anything. It doesn't end there either, India's new influence in her life gives her the courage to render tormentors a run around of her own.

Stoker isn't as violent or bloodletting as Chan-wook’s earlier films, but it also less dour, meshing stylishness with Gothic fairy tale. The film has an absolutely sumptuous look to it, inviting viewers to lean in when they should be backing away. The camera, the music, and all the pure technique all totaling into a visually mesmerizing piece. Park creates innovative images that just aren't seen much anymore (watching a mane of Kidman's hair transition into a tall field of grass is just spectacular).

Kidman launches into her scenes with gusto and chews into scenery like a thick steak. Wasikowska does her level-best treading the line of sexual tension and darker desires as she grows into an adult. Now if only the script were up for rivaling the direction and acting in quality. As a cat-and-mouse thriller, Uncle Charlie never has the upper hand, which makes the thriller aspect a bit off, but the horror is there though, presenting a bloodline that finds killing as easy as breathing.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Anomalisa

Weird is rarely used as a good quality in film criticism, but few words so completely describe Charlie Kaufman’s work as weird does. All of his films are a window into his very particular worldview, and that p.o.v. is certainly unlike anything seen in pop culture. For that reason, Anomalisa became an entry on many most anticipated lists for 2015. That Kaufman chose stop-motion to tell this story made the picture an event. So it came as a disappointment when the film was one of the year’s more mundane efforts.

Being John Malkovich and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind have an energy and heart at the center that is not present here. Previous collaborators like Spike Jonze and Michel Gondry were able to temper the overwhelming negativity Charlie Kaufman occasionally falls prey to, but, this time, the writer doesn’t have a director to rein things in. In all of his efforts to create an experience that is both familiar and alienating, Kaufman may have accidentally created something host…

Hulk vs. The Incredible Hulk vs. The Avengers

There are two movies about the Hulk and one that features the green monster as a major player. One was made in 2003 by an auteur, starring a little-known Aussie. Five years later The Incredible Hulk came out to the same tepid reaction as Ang Lee's Hulk did. This weekend, The Avengers made the Hulk as popular as he has been in a long time. So it comes down to this: Hulk vs. Hulk vs. Hulk. Who will smash whom?

Round One: Acting
Edward Norton outshines Eric Bana as the dual persona of the meek Bruce Banner and the rage-induced Hulk. Eric Bana was given little to do but run and fight and often the audience was just waiting for him to transform. With the Incredible Hulk, Norton's Banner is fully fleshed-out and we are given a reason to care about him. Being allowed to go a little dark with Banner's scenes questioning what is left of his life provided emotional resonance to the character that Hulk lacked. Yet even with the capable performance that Norton gives there was something …

The Dream Is Real

For my money there is nothing cooler than the idea of a city folding in on itself.