Skip to main content

'Bourne' Again


Apparently, Joel Edgerton isn't a big enough name draw for The Bourne Legacy so they've casted the next face of the Mission Impossible series, Jeremy Renner. The choice seems like an oddity considering his workload for the next few years - The Avengers, Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters and the aforementioned Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol.

Renner is an Oscar nominee and a proven actor, it just doesn't seem like a great idea to cast an actor with that much on his plate (was Jmes Franco unavailable?), especially when that plate includes your main spy-film competition.

I wonder when Hollywood will realize that if you don't give little-known talents like Edgerton shots, then Jeremy Renner isn't around at all.

Comments

JL said…
I heard about this yesterday (or the other day) and didn't mind the choice. However, I forgot all about him doing the Mission Impossible thing. In that light, I think it's horrible to sign him for both with the franchises being of so similar a nature. Just doesn't allow him to become either one of those characters fully.
CastorTroy said…
Yes Renner is all good. I guess he could suffer from overexposure next year but then, it's Jeremy Renner. People are still going to love him. I understand that you wanted a guy like Joel Edgerton but it simply isn't a sound business choice to cast a guy who is basically unknown as the face of your rebooting franchise.

It's not like Renner came out of nowhere, he worked his way up through the trenches, was great in a supporting role in The Town and now is getting his spot in the limelight.
Fletch said…
I'm with you, Fitz...Joel Edgerton's time is now. It's a shame that his MMA flick looks so crappy; but then again, it's with Tom Hardy, so that will likely benefit Edgerton in the long run anyway (while leaving no heat on him if it fails).

And I disagree, Castor - if this were a new franchise, perhaps, but expectations will be lowered without Damon regardless. If ever there were a time to strike and attempt to hit it with a lesser name, this is it. Hell, Thor has an untested lead and I doubt many are worried about its prospects. And need I remind you of a little known franchise called Star Trek, which was a huge movie with an untested star.
JL said…
That's a very interesting point that I think I have to agree with. I know I'm in that camp that is already beginning to be skeptical of the movie just because Damon isn't returning. Thus, if they put a nobody in there (that doesn't succeed) it won't be a crushing blow that will have me completely dismissing that guy. It will just be a "yea, I knew it. But hey, it's Damon, those are some tough shoes to fill."

Whereas, putting a nobody in there and having him actually do good would make it something of a surprise hit. With Renner, I expect him to do good, cause he is indeed good. Just don't see him filling this type of role like Damon did.

So basically, I'm going to be disappointed because it's not Damon. Nobody they put in there will be better in a "Bourne" role in my eyes. So they only "win" in this situation is allowing someone to prove themself and they capitalize on that opportunity. Renner can't capitalize on that opportunity really, for the fact that he's already proven himself to me.
Paid Critique said…
is he really the one on the AVENGER? it seems like its not him. he looks much better on the movie.

courtney,
trousers and suit.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Anomalisa

Weird is rarely used as a good quality in film criticism, but few words so completely describe Charlie Kaufman’s work as weird does. All of his films are a window into his very particular worldview, and that p.o.v. is certainly unlike anything seen in pop culture. For that reason, Anomalisa became an entry on many most anticipated lists for 2015. That Kaufman chose stop-motion to tell this story made the picture an event. So it came as a disappointment when the film was one of the year’s more mundane efforts.

Being John Malkovich and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind have an energy and heart at the center that is not present here. Previous collaborators like Spike Jonze and Michel Gondry were able to temper the overwhelming negativity Charlie Kaufman occasionally falls prey to, but, this time, the writer doesn’t have a director to rein things in. In all of his efforts to create an experience that is both familiar and alienating, Kaufman may have accidentally created something host…

Review: Selma

It may surprise many that Martin Luther King Jr. never received the celluloid treatment prior to Selma. Sure he had been mentioned in other historical pieces, but short of documentary footage, King was never given center stage. Quite shocking given the man's legacy and the lingering effect of his efforts still felt today. Several years of production and a director change later, Selma arrives as the film worthy of the man.

Review: The Salvation

Westerns have never recovered from the oversaturation that killed off viewer interest decades ago, but every now and then a gem pops up. Recent successes like The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, 2007’s 3:10 to Yuma and the Coen brothers adaptation of True Grit all did well because they tweaked the genre slightly, but director Kristian Levring goes with an old school approach. A faithful recreation of those revenge Westerns made so popular in the 1970s, The Salvation envelopes many elements of previous Clint Eastwood classics and wraps it into a tidy package.

The Salvation starts in on the central dilemma, joining Jon (Hannibal‘s Mad Mikkelsen) at the train station where he awaits the arrival of his wife and son. Jon and his brother, Peter (Mikael Persbrandt), have lived in the United States long enough to build a hospitable life for their family back in Denmark. This homecoming should be a sweet moment to establish the family important to Jon, but fate plays out…