Skip to main content

Raging Bull (1980) & Boogie Nights (1997)


Granted had I watched any other film but Boogie Nights after I had watched Raging Bull I would have never realized the structural similarities between the two, but I did, so here we go.

Both features start off with their central characters Jake (Robert De Niro) and Eddie (Mark Wahlberg) just barely staving off mediocrity. But success follows shortly after with Jake meeting the new love of his wife, current wife be damned, Vickie (Cathy Moriarty) and Eddie meeting Adult Film Director Extraordinaire Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds) and becoming an adult film star with the moniker Dirk Diggler.

Jake LaMotta with the aid of his brother Joe(Joe Pesci in arguably his best performance ever) starts whooping ass and beating every opponent that comes his way, even perpetual foe Sugar Ray Robinson. With the money pouring in LaMotta gets married to Vickie and starts a family. Dirk is quickly becoming the toast of the pornography world and a major component of Horner's legacy.

LaMotta eventually gets his title shot after making a deal with mob boss Tommy, but it comes with a cost as LaMotta has to take a dive. Once at the title-fight Jake absolutely demolishes Marcel Cerdan taking the long awaited Middleweight belt for keeps. Dirk, after consulting with Jack, gets his own James Bond knock-off franchise and the money keeps rolling in.

But of course as is with all Martin Scorsese and Paul Thomas Anderson films there can be no happy endings. LaMotta retires after losing his belt to Robinson and opens a nightclub. At the nightclub a fourteen year old girl is served alcohol and "introduced" to some of LaMotta's acquanitances. Vickie leaves him and takes full-custody of the children. Afterwards LaMotta is locked up for failing to obtain the $10,000 he needs for bail.

Dirk becomes engaged in a major coke habit and decides he is a star in his own right shunning Jack and branching out with Reed(John C. Reilly) to become musicians. Their mutual friendship with dealer Todd(Thomas Jane) becomes dangerous as he decides to rob a producer and ends up getting killed and Reed and Dirk are running for their lives. Dirk is eventually nearly beaten to death after being jumped by a gang of homophobes. LaMotta returns to performing sub-standard comedy at nightclubs and Dirk reunites with Horner and his "family".

Knocked down, but not defeated Dirk and Jake end both films almost identically as both are giving themselves pep talks in front of the mirrors of their dressing rooms.

Both films are essentially character studies and considered the best works of each director, I personally find There Will Be Blood and Goodfellas to be each director's Magnum Opus, respectively. But that is another debate for another day.

Popular posts from this blog

Hulk vs. The Incredible Hulk vs. The Avengers

There are two movies about the Hulk and one that features the green monster as a major player. One was made in 2003 by an auteur, starring a little-known Aussie. Five years later The Incredible Hulk came out to the same tepid reaction as Ang Lee's Hulk did. This weekend, The Avengers made the Hulk as popular as he has been in a long time. So it comes down to this: Hulk vs. Hulk vs. Hulk. Who will smash whom?

Round One: Acting
Edward Norton outshines Eric Bana as the dual persona of the meek Bruce Banner and the rage-induced Hulk. Eric Bana was given little to do but run and fight and often the audience was just waiting for him to transform. With the Incredible Hulk, Norton's Banner is fully fleshed-out and we are given a reason to care about him. Being allowed to go a little dark with Banner's scenes questioning what is left of his life provided emotional resonance to the character that Hulk lacked. Yet even with the capable performance that Norton gives there was something …

Review: The Salvation

Westerns have never recovered from the oversaturation that killed off viewer interest decades ago, but every now and then a gem pops up. Recent successes like The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, 2007’s 3:10 to Yuma and the Coen brothers adaptation of True Grit all did well because they tweaked the genre slightly, but director Kristian Levring goes with an old school approach. A faithful recreation of those revenge Westerns made so popular in the 1970s, The Salvation envelopes many elements of previous Clint Eastwood classics and wraps it into a tidy package.

The Salvation starts in on the central dilemma, joining Jon (Hannibal‘s Mad Mikkelsen) at the train station where he awaits the arrival of his wife and son. Jon and his brother, Peter (Mikael Persbrandt), have lived in the United States long enough to build a hospitable life for their family back in Denmark. This homecoming should be a sweet moment to establish the family important to Jon, but fate plays out…

Review: The Voices

Jerry (Ryan Reynolds) spends his days working the nine-to-five shift at his new job at the Milton Bathtub Factory. Jerry is chipper to the point that he may turn some people off, but he never stops trying to make friends. Friends are something that Jerry could use because the only other conversation he has is with his dog Bosco and his cat Mr. Whiskers. Things are looking up though, Jerry has been tasked with planning the company picnic and he’s asked a girl (Gemma Arterton) out on a date. Jerry is so excited to share the news he rushes home to tell his pets about Fiona. Oddly enough, both Bosco and Mr. Whiskers start talking back.

No need to go back and re-read that last sentence, yes, Ryan Reynolds has pets who talk back to him. His dog, Bosco, is quite affable, however, his cat, Mr. Whiskers, would feel right at home curled in the lap of Blofeld. Unfortunately for everyone around him, it’s the advice of the evil cat that Jerry heeds more often than not. For all of Jerry’s pleasant…